Theoretical Research Into Pain and Its Effect on Movement Patterns
"Movement is changed in pain. This presents across a spectrum from subtle changes in the manner in which a task is completed to complete avoidance of a function and could be both a cause and effect of pain/nociceptive input and/or injury." (Hodges & Smeets, 2015).
I have been looking into the relationship between pain and movement. Since I suffer from chronic pain myself, I have noticed how over time my movement patterns have changed and adapted to facilitate pain-free movement. It is the protective body's response to the triggered nerves that try to prevent damage to the tissue by limiting and slowing down any related movement. I wanted to figure out if there are any resources discussing the change in human behavior, movement patterns, and anatomy when affected by chronic pain. Although the research is very limited, there are a few core theories that I am going to look at:
The first major theory is "The Vicious Cycle" (pain-spasm-pain cycle)
The second theory is the "Pain Adaptation theory", proposed by Dr. James P. Lund
It is often referred to as a hypothesis that challenges the mentioned "Pain-spasm-pain cycle" theory.
"Dr. Lund was the chief architect of the Pain Adaptation Model, which redefined the role of pain in clinical presentations, including persistent muscle pain conditions such as masticatory muscle pain, back pain, and fibromyalgia. The model challenged and displaced the prevailing Vicious Cycle Theory that was directing care for many pain conditions." (Stohler et al., 2009).
The theory, which is based on experimental observations, proposed that activity of muscles that are painful or that produce a painful movement reduces during voluntary efforts, whereas that of opposing/antagonist muscles increases. This adaptation reduces the amplitude and velocity of the painful movement, and it decreases the force produced by the muscle.
Based on experimental observations, the theory suggests that "the activity of muscles that are painful or that produce a painful movement reduces during voluntary efforts, whereas that of opposing/antagonist muscles increases." (Tucker, 2010). This adaptation results in the smaller amplitude and speed of the movement as well as a decrease in force produced by the muscle.
There is another theory, that includes elements of both mentioned hypotheses proposed by Professor Greg M. Murray and Christopher. C. Peck. It looks at the motor adaptation to pain from a more individualised perspective that depends on a specific case of pain.
The theory consists of five key elements, "that expand on the basic premise that the adaptation to pain aims to reduce pain and protect the painful part, but with a more flexible solution than currently proposed." (Peck & Murray, 2008).
Adaptation to pain:
1. Involves redistribution of activity within and between muscles
2. Changes the mechanical behaviour such as modified movement and stiffness
3. Leads to protection from further pain or injury, or from threatened pain or injury
4. Is not explained by simple changes in excitability but involves changes at multiple levels of the motor system, and these changes may be complementary, additive, or competitive
5. Has short-term benefit but has potential long-term consequences due to factors such as increased load, decreased movement, and decreased variability
Comments
Post a Comment